Life of Pi’s 2013 VFX Oscar win hides an industry in crisis


We sum up and rebound this article by Neil Bennet, source: DigitalArts magazine, with surprising stories and an interesting analysis about the creative industry for cinema Visual Effects. 

Life of Pi‘s Oscar win for visual effects offers a sobering reflection on the precarious financial state of much of the VFX industry.

That Life of Pi picked up this year’s gong was no surprise. Following Hugo‘s win last year it appears the Academy is – as with the other categories – finally favouring use of VFX for emotional resonance rather than who can make robots explode with the most accurately rendered shrapnel. Life of Pi‘s beautifully art-directed CG is by turns elegant and epic, while its synthetic animals are more than just superbly renderings of fur and hide – they’re wonderfully realised characters that easily manage to out-act Rafe Spall.

What might shock you though, is that the main provider of VFX for the film, Rhythm & Hues, filed for bankruptcy protection in the US on February 13 after a mooted sale to Prime Focus, requiring a bailout from Legendary Pictures to finish work on fantasy film Seventh Son. This is no small shop: the company created VFX last year for effects-heavy teen fare including The Hunger Games and Snow White and The Huntsman, and employed 568 people across five nations on Life of Pi alone.

The huge scale of its work in pure stats alone – handily compiled by Autodesk as unsurprisingly its CG tools were use to create much of the VFX – gives you some idea of what it cost R&H to create the VFX: 446 stereoscopic shots, a CG tiger with 10 million hairs, 5,000 rendering processors. And then there was the mere matters of the colossal R&D required to develop these and the artistry involved in making the animals and world ‘live’.

In the same week as filing for bankruptcy protection, it shed 254 of its 768 employees, according to court filings cited by the Wall Street Journal. The troubles even lead to a protest outside last night’s Oscars, with the image below widely shared around Facebook and Twitter.

Sadly, financial woes are an industry-wide issue for larger, global post houses. It’s easy to write-off the near-demise of another grand dames Digital Domain in September to an apparently poorly conceived attempt to set up its own animation studio and school – which is perhaps ironic as diversifying into other areas was often cited a few years ago as one of the big growth areas for the industry – but it’s clear that things are hard all over.


So how is the industry so troubled when the film business seems somewhat resilient in the face of a recession – especially when common wisdom has it that VFX-heavy films often provide exactly the kind of escapism audiences demand in times of austerity? The perception is that the industry is spending too much money and not getting paid enough. Some feel that the VFX industry itself is to blame: agreeing to lower budgets in the face of increasing film company – and audience – demands, willingly signing up to do more and more unpaid pitch work, and letting filmmakers get away with more costly changes than have been costed in.


We’re in a post-VFX age. Composited CG elements and digital manipulation of video are as inherent to the filmmaking process as editing, production or costume design. Filmmakers need to ensure that VFX houses are given compensation for their talents, but they also need to focus on creating elements that add to the power of a film – eschewing just piling on complexity instead of adding truly special effects.

Read the full article here: DigitalArts magazine


Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Promoting Cultural and Creative Industries: Maximising their Economic and Social Contribution in the...
Europe is the second largest Cultural and Creative industries (CCIs or Cultural and Creative sector, CCS) market in the world after Asia. A study by ‘Cultural Times’ estimates that European Union creates 32% of global CCI revenues and 26% of world-wide CCI jobs. Numerous surveys have proven that this field is one of the most sustainable in times of crises and can more easily adapt to the changing conditions. According to Eurostat, in 2015 the cultural sector constituted 2.9% of the total Europea...
The 20th International Conference on Cultural Economics
RMIT University  is pleased to host the 20th International Conference on Cultural Economics, presented by the Association for Cultural Economics International (ACEI). The Conference will be held in Melbourne, Australia, from Tuesday June 26th to Friday June 29th , 2018. The program chair is Prof. Alan Collins (University of Portsmouth, UK), ACEI president-elect. Conference theme include: creative industries, technological disruption in the arts, international trade in art and culture, cultural...
Presenting EMOTIVE project
Emotive is an EU-funded heritage project that aims to use emotional storytelling to dramatically change how we experience heritage sites. For heritage professionals, the Emotive application will provide a powerful storytelling engine and a set of rich digital media assets that can be used to create detailed characters and narratives featuring archaeological sites or collections of artefacts. For visitors, Emotive will offer dramatic, emotionally engaging stories that can be experienced while...
Cultural and Creative Industries in Europe: Maximising the Contribution of Culture towards Social an...
Culture represents an extensive economic asset and a valuable source of creativity and innovation. According to the European Parliament’s report on EU policy for cultural and creative industries (June 2016), Cultural and Creative Industries (CCIs) have become high-capacity engines for economic growth, representing 11.2% of all private enterprises and 7.5% of all employed persons. Beyond their significant economic contribution, CCIs have built a bridge between arts, culture, business and technolo...